Does anyone know the FULL facts with 100% certainty?
If not, then I think it is pointless to speculate ad nauseam about what JB or SK coulda, woulda, shoulda done.
None of us really knows what went on, or even what the source of the story is.
I'm guessing it was some bloke on the internet. Oh well, that's a reliable source then.
There is obviously some sort of story here, but details matter, and as far as I'm aware, we don't have those.
For example, when the story first broke, it said he had been sacked.
Well, that's clearly not true for a start. Just a minor detail, not.
Look, I get that people on here don't like the bloke, I really do. BUT, does he deserve to be possibly slandered on here with lies, half truths and speculation?
Oh well, that's my view anyway. I just think that people deserve to be dealt with honestly, rather than with semi facts and speculation.
If the story about the sacking was wrong, how much of the rest is not true too?