I think he is being told its time he kept his theiving mits in his pocketsOh no he ain’t View attachment 24919
Granted. But doesn't make It embarrassing that the story has been leaked. From a Millwall point of you, yes, It's embarrassing for them. But fuck em. It serves them right for continuing to give seemingly ever grater employment to a man who Is quite literally the antithesis of the paying customers, the "fans like no other" who's money they take and who's loyalty they need to survive.Club shouldn't be washing its dirty linen in public.he should be sacked end of
I noticed he was no where to be seen pitch side earlier. Well I never see his usually unmissable Quasimodo gait stalking the sidelines and I was keeping an eye out for him. So as I said to my Brother, they're actively keeping him well out the way of us lot.From HOF
someone went right up to his face and in the honey monster voice shouted “who took the money honey” followed by laughing dogs abuse from everyone….
And 3 they allowed it to carry on ,as it must have been happening over a considerable period of time , unless the fat cunt did it in one sitting.I find this story embarrassing one that the silly cunt behaved like he did and two someone thought it was worth making public
Millwall family mate*I noticed he was no where to be seen pitch side earlier. Well I never see his usually unmissable Quasimodo gait stalking the sidelines and I was keeping an eye out for him. So as I said to my Brother, they're actively keeping him well out the way of us lot.
To me that makes It 10 times worse. They know he did wrong, they know the fans are unhappy and want to bury him and yet they are still protecting the cunt. I feel there's something very unbecoming and being the cynical and suspicious person I am, something very dubious about him and his close ties and employment with the club
Plus any punishment overturned à la Post Office scandal.Any supporters sanctioned by the club for "misbehaviour" on match days on Lurch's so called evidence, should be asking for at the very least, an apology.
How can anyone act on the say so of this hi-vis wearing fucking tumour, if the allegations against him are proven?
He has misappropriated funds (possibly comitted fraud and thieft). I dont know any employer who would not sack an employee on the spot for doing this. Why on earth the club would want to cover this up raises some questions. Who is at the club trying to protect him? He is hardly a great ambassador or role model for the club. Has this highlighted others who are mis-using funds??Unbelievable he’s still near the football club at all . Watch what happens if you’re unfortunate enough to be slung out for a minor misdemeanour at The Den and banned from being within a mile of any Wall game based on false and malicious accusations from stewards as I was some years ago . These false accusations were later found to be without any substance at all , I was banned for 6 months in spite of this . Yet this turd has committed a criminal offence and is still gainfully employed by Millwall FC .
Does anyone know the FULL facts with 100% certainty?It would be interesting to know if James Berylson has been made aware of this “incident,” and whether it was he (or maybe Kavanagh) who made the decision to keep this thieving cunt still on the payroll?
If it was Kavanagh’s decision (and JB isn’t aware of what’s gone on), is there any way we can personally contact JB through his company, (by email), or on LinkedIn or any other social media outlet he may use? Maybe if enough of us bombard him with complaints, he might a) become aware of what’s happened, and b) sack the cunt!
I’d be very surprised that JB would allow theft by a company employee to go unpunished in some way!
Does anyone know the FULL facts with 100% certainty?
If not, then I think it is pointless to speculate ad nauseam about what JB or SK coulda, woulda, shoulda done.
None of us really knows what went on, or even what the source of the story is.
I'm guessing it was some bloke on the internet. Oh well, that's a reliable source then.
There is obviously some sort of story here, but details matter, and as far as I'm aware, we don't have those.
For example, when the story first broke, it said he had been sacked.
Well, that's clearly not true for a start. Just a minor detail, not.
Look, I get that people on here don't like the bloke, I really do. BUT, does he deserve to be possibly slandered on here with lies, half truths and speculation?
Oh well, that's my view anyway. I just think that people deserve to be dealt with honestly, rather than with semi facts and speculation.
If the story about the sacking was wrong, how much of the rest is not true too?
A voice of reason.Does anyone know the FULL facts with 100% certainty?
If not, then I think it is pointless to speculate ad nauseam about what JB or SK coulda, woulda, shoulda done.
None of us really knows what went on, or even what the source of the story is.
I'm guessing it was some bloke on the internet. Oh well, that's a reliable source then.
There is obviously some sort of story here, but details matter, and as far as I'm aware, we don't have those.
For example, when the story first broke, it said he had been sacked.
Well, that's clearly not true for a start. Just a minor detail, not.
Look, I get that people on here don't like the bloke, I really do. BUT, does he deserve to be possibly slandered on here with lies, half truths and speculation?
Oh well, that's my view anyway. I just think that people deserve to be dealt with honestly, rather than with semi facts and speculation.
If the story about the sacking was wrong, how much of the rest is not true too?