A lot on here shouting out for 442 and I can understand why but who would you drop or pick to facilitate this as the back four:
Ballard, Hutchinson, Cooper, McNamara, Malone, Leonard, Pearce or Murray
My thoughts are this could only work with following:
Leonard RB Hutchinson CH Cooper CH Murray LB
That would be harsh on Ballard, McNamara and Malone. No way can Ballard play right back or as proven could you drop Hutchinson for Ballard. Hutchinson as seen already is the organiser and when he didn’t play through injury we were at sixes and sevens with Jake leading the line.
You could put McNamara at RB and Malone at LB but I fear we would get caught out defensively.
Unfortunately my fellow Wall we are stuck with 3 or 5 at the back, whichever you want to call it. The only way I see us playing a flat four would be if we are chasing a game like Saturday or GR decides to go for it with 20 minutes to go.
Be careful what you wish for.
COYL
Ballard, Hutchinson, Cooper, McNamara, Malone, Leonard, Pearce or Murray
My thoughts are this could only work with following:
Leonard RB Hutchinson CH Cooper CH Murray LB
That would be harsh on Ballard, McNamara and Malone. No way can Ballard play right back or as proven could you drop Hutchinson for Ballard. Hutchinson as seen already is the organiser and when he didn’t play through injury we were at sixes and sevens with Jake leading the line.
You could put McNamara at RB and Malone at LB but I fear we would get caught out defensively.
Unfortunately my fellow Wall we are stuck with 3 or 5 at the back, whichever you want to call it. The only way I see us playing a flat four would be if we are chasing a game like Saturday or GR decides to go for it with 20 minutes to go.
Be careful what you wish for.
COYL