Agree, but I don’t think he was as good as Paul Scholes.When players like Zidane, Ronaldo (the Brazilian one, Roberto Carlos and Keane rate him as a player, I think he had more to his bow then just his free kicks.
Agree, but I don’t think he was as good as Paul Scholes.When players like Zidane, Ronaldo (the Brazilian one, Roberto Carlos and Keane rate him as a player, I think he had more to his bow then just his free kicks.
Poor taste in sorts.What else did he have apart from a right foot ?
And corners.When players like Zidane, Ronaldo (the Brazilian one, Roberto Carlos and Keane rate him as a player, I think he had more to his bow then just his free kicks.
absolute nonsense, was easily the best player in the world in 99 and should have won the world player/ballon d'or. Add in that he never gave less than 100% in and England shirt, despite making a very memorable mistake, won titles in 4 countries, played for top teams all around Europe, and captained his country. Other than that, he's shitfor silly haircuts & stupid tattoos & marriage to that talent less stick insect, for football, the great g best said
He can’t head a ball can’t dribble can’t tackle can’t use his left foot he’s average
In your opinion. Rivaldo, Figo and Zidane from that era were all better players than Beckham.absolute nonsense, was easily the best player in the world in 99 and should have won the world player/ballon d'or.
Not in that year, and it was shown that Rivaldo won the player of the year because Man Utd players split the vote whereas usually there’s 1 player in each teamIn your opinion. Rivaldo, Figo and Zidane from that era were all better players than Beckham.
All about personal opinions mate. There's no definitive answer.Not in that year, and it was shown that Rivaldo won the player of the year because Man Utd players split the vote whereas usually there’s 1 player in each team
Agreed regarding opinions, but other top players have said that he should win it that year tooAll about personal opinions mate. There's no definitive answer.