mickynomates
Well-known member
Pity. Was not that long ago when Brentford were a smaller club than us. Good luck to Josh and hopefully we get some compensation out of the deal.
It’s all about the money, honey.A move to a premier side isn't necessarily in the best interests for the player because they are much less likely to breakthrough into the first team. They literally stop developing because they don't play any football. I could list countless names that moved from smaller clubs to premier clubs cause they should potential only to be never heard of again.
Yep. As Zak Lovelaces old man can attest to.It’s all about the money, honey.
Mate, I wonder if there should be controls put in place to stop so called bigger clubs poaching youngsters? The investment in them doesn’t stop at football and includes key elements like education. These controls need to obviously benefit a number of stakeholders including the player and the parent club. Just a thought P.A move to a premier side isn't necessarily in the best interests for the player because they are much less likely to breakthrough into the first team. They literally stop developing because they don't play any football. I could list countless names that moved from smaller clubs to premier clubs cause they should potential only to be never heard of again.
Burey and Emakhu had both signed professional contracts with the clubs we got them from. They weren't academy or youth team players.These things go both ways, when we singed Tyler Burey and Aidemo Emakhu we poached them from smaller clubs for them to play in our reserves for a bit.
There probably are some controls/ rules but quite often there is always a way around them. Because no transfer fee is allowed the player misses out on a potential signing on fee. It's quite common for the pursuing club to buy the players parents/ family a house instead. I know for a fact the Zak Lovelaces family got well looked after when he left us for Rangers.Mate, I wonder if there should be controls put in place to stop so called bigger clubs poaching youngsters?
Spot on, there is a food chain in football and sadly we're not at the top of it. a shame to lose a promising player but we've got to be realistic, if the player won't sign a new deal the club HAS to do all it can to get a good fee for them.These things go both ways, when we singed Tyler Burey and Aidemo Emakhu we poached them from smaller clubs for them to play in our reserves for a bit. Didn’t work out for Burey, and I’m sure a few AFC Wimbledon fans are now saying ‘why did he go to Millwall?’
Thanks for your insights mate and seem sound to me.There probably are some controls/ rules but quite often there is always a way around them. Because no transfer fee is allowed the player misses out on a potential signing on fee. It's quite common for the pursuing club to buy the players parents/ family a house instead. I know for a fact the Zak Lovelaces family got well looked after when he left us for Rangers.
There's other factors that may make your suggestion difficult to impose. One is whether employment law means you can't restrict freedom of movement. The other is that quite often it's the players parents rather than an interested ' bigger ' club that want to force the issue and move the son on to a bigger club.
Is this true? Not that I’m a Brentford expert but, I can’t think of any player who’s come through their youth setup to the 1st team then go onto bigger thingsRealistically if you were the kids family, Brentford is a fantastic proposition. They are known for their ability to gets kids into their and other first teams, it’s still in London and they’re in the premier league
They're known for finding potential talent and cast offs from overseas and the lower leagues then selling them on if they're a success. So the chances are that a kid will be surpassed by a cheap acquisition from abroad.Realistically if you were the kids family, Brentford is a fantastic proposition. They are known for their ability to gets kids into their and other first teams,