Date: 8th November 2017 at 5:25pm
Written by:

Millwall have this evening confirmed that the Football Association’s appeal panel have upheld the sending off of Jed Wallace.

Wallace was sent off for a foul on Burton Albion’s Tom Flanagan and the referee decided in the moment that it was worthy of a straight red card, but following the failure of the appeal Wallace is now set to miss games against Sunderland, Hull City and Fulham.

With it being the second time so far this season that the FA have rejected an appeal, Millwall’s frustration is made worse as talks have been had with officials inside of the FA and at the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) and those talks confirmed that the referee erred in his decision and the appeal should’ve been successful.

A statement from Millwall tonight demanded urgent talks with the FA, the EFL with PGMOL present.

‘The club is extremely disappointed by the decision and believes the result of this appeal calls into question The FA`s entire processes in this regard. Consequently, the club is now calling on The FA, with assistance from The PGMOL, to review the appeals process to ensure greater consistency and clarity in their decisions.’

The Statement went on to say.

‘In the days since Wallace`s dismissal senior figures at the club have had private discussions with The PGMOL and the Head of Judicial Services at The FA and both, after reviewing the clip, insisted that it was not a red card offence. On the day of the game the match assessor privately informed the club that it was not a sending off offence. The fourth official, speaking to the referee following the foul, advised him it should be a yellow card. The referee made this admission after the game.’

Adding.

‘Since the rejection of this appeal The PGMOL have gone on record to say they are “flabbergasted” with the decision and confirmed that at no point did anyone from The FA seek their opinion. The club accepts that the current process does not allow for this which is why it is calling for a review into the way The FA judges appeals in order to modernise and, importantly, to ensure proper discussion with the relevant professional bodies takes place. It would appear in this instance that The FA have assumed that because the referee has stuck to his position on the dismissal that this too must be the view held by The PGMOL. That is clearly not the case.’

Millwall went on to point out that handling an appeal without a reference to the PGMOL shows how ‘archaic’ the current system is and they further pointed to Aston Villa’s successful appeal of Henri Lansbury’s red card earlier in the season to highlight the unfairness and arbitrary nature of appeal decisions in the current system.

‘The club`s view is that The PGMOL should be involved in The FA`s appeal process which, as it stands, appears archaic. This incident highlights how a lack of appropriate communication has led to a decision which goes completely against the views of several other professionals, including the referees` own governing body. Earlier this season an Aston Villa player in another Championship match was dismissed for a foul similar to Wallace`s yet had that red card overturned following an appeal. Clearly such inconsistencies are not good for the integrity of the game or this country`s leading governing body.’

For many fans it simply reinforces opinions about the Football Association.

‘Steve Kavanagh, the club`s chief executive officer, has requested a joint meeting with The FA, the Head of Judicial Services at The FA, the Head of The PGMOL and The EFL.’

Source: official site.

Vital Millwall on: facebook

Vital Millwall on: twitter

Bloggers

Join The Vital Debate